lifeprint said:
My company wants everyone to use Act!. It is a special version for the mortgage industry. But I'm not sure how I can use it in the Getting Things Done system.
Don't get stuck on thinking that you need to do GTD exactly this way or that way, and do not get stuck thinking that if you have to use Act! for contacts and calendar, that you have to put your lists in there also. Many people have their contacts in a laptop or PDA, their appointments in a paper bound calendar, and their lists on stacks of 3 by 5 cards. This is ok. David says to put your "stuff" from inside your brain into a "trusted system". That system could be Act! for contacts and calendar, and paper or 3x5 cards for your projects and next actions. Whatever is comfortable to you.
So, find out what you have to use Act! for in your company and do that, and then figure out what works for you for the other parts of GTD.
Now, the other thing you asked about.
I think it is ok for you to write task lists on 3 by 5 cards, if each card contains a separate sub-project where there is a specific sequence that those tasks should be completed in. If you have five things that you would do for one sub-project, that you would do in a specific order, in a specific location, or with a specific set of tools, then that is a task list.
David is against the typical to do list that contains unrelated items, no next actions, general terms that can not be done, and apply to several different locations.
One 3x5 card could be @officephone/smith-properties/1600-Ave-House/telephone-calls and then a list of calls in order that you need to make for that specific sub-project.
David would only be against a task list that said: buy xm radio, find out about soccer game, get johnson property loan, make ice cream, all on the same list. Because those are not TASKS, and they are not NEXT ACTIONS. They are projects and goals.
If you are still confused, ask and read here. It is more important that you figure out your personal theology on this task list/action item issue than you figure out how you are going to physically do it.
Maybe not you, but many people seem to get confused with the "next action" idea, that they are only allowed to write down one next action for each project or sub-project. I think that after you write down the very next action, you need to think about the next next action, and then the next next next action, and that list becomes your task list, with your next action at the top, but then your actionable items in sequence after that.
So. Let's say you have actionable items that could be done in any order. Your system needs to allow you the flexibility to choose when you are working what order you do those items in. I may get hammered here, but you could create a task list that has numbers to the left of your task items for items in sequence, and task lists with square boxes to the left of your items for a list of items that can be done in any order, but this second list sould be items that are related to one specific location, like work-computer, work-phone, home-finances, west-side-shopping, etc.