Confessions of GTD - The Importance of Details

In the immortal words of Bruce Lee:
It's not the daily increase but daily decrease. Hack away at the unessential.

Hi!

I have read topics on this forum for a while and I felt like contributing. I became inspired after a number of events that accumulated this and last week. Events that made me realize that I had not been paying enough attention to certain details. It may sound a bit dramatic, and in a way it is and isn't at the same time. Having read Getting Things Done more than once I thought I had it, but I now realize that I certainly did not. For a little while I have been making screencasts about productivity and tools for my friends. Mostly just to learn how to screencast, but I thought it would also be interesting to see how I could teach them about GTD.

My initial thought was to go through the five phases of mastering workflow. First starting of course with collection and buckets. It went very well and that part is very easy as long as you simplify the amount of buckets (email, physical, digital with Evernote). Processing is in a way easy to understand, but its reliance on organizing (having a system) made it uniquely difficult for me to talk about. I could not do that part without talking first about how to set up your own system. The system I wound up with was GTD with Evernote. Seemed fine right? Yes and no. As I started going through processing, and re-reading the book, my eyes opened up to a detail I seemingly glanced over before. I didn't put a next action on things I should have put a next action on, I would process everything in one go and not do the organizing bit. In effect I tried to do both at the same time.

The other problem was that the system I had put in place didn't have the edges I really needed. Do I place stuff that is project support in general reference, or is there a better way to link things together? I came to understand that the system I wanted had not been thought out. I thought that buying a guide would be sufficiently enough and do the thinking for me. What I now have is a mess of folders, albeit organized, but not functional in any way that I would like. For some it could maybe serve as a proper system, but for me the edges aren't clear enough.

Because I did not have a system with those edges, I would struggle with processing my inbox because I didn't know how to organize things. That small detail, that I would assign a next action to anything that was actionable, made me realize that. This struggle of not knowing what to do would represent itself with things like: "Resource for drawing a business plan", "Running a one-man business" and "Tax information for small business", because I didn't know what to really do with it. And yes, I am in the process of creating my own business :). Would I put this in a general reference or would I add this to a project? And if I would add it to a project (i.e. Create My Company), how would I store it there? I wasn't as organized at all as I thought.

So why did I have such a problem organizing it? I could of course have just placed in a Notebook (folder in Evernote) called Business Support and be done with it. In one way I have no problem doing so, but realistically it goes against how my brain works. My brain wants to know only the information it needs when I am working on something specific. Basically with the setup I had in Evernote, trying to facilitate everything, made it very overwhelming because I saw much more than I wanted to, much more than I needed. Having one system to rule it all wasn't as great as I thought it to be.

First thing I did was exporting all of my Next Actions from Evernote to iCloud reminders. If it isn't easy enough to be in Reminders, I haven't thought it through enough. Reminders is also great as I usually have my iPhone and iPad around for that. Okay, I have my Next Actions sorted. My collection tools are still Evernote (for capturing ideas etc.), email and physical paper. No change there.

Now what about the rest? I remember reading Chapter 4 (setting up the time, space and tools) and not being able to relate to it. Most of my life has been spent on the computer and almost everything I have is digital. I do have binders with A-Z person general collection, one for my upcoming business A-Z general collection, two binders for finances (personal and business). Other than that I do not need to store much, nor do I need anything related to paper at all. How do I organize my projects? And what about project support and other digital references? Someday / Maybe? In the beginning of chapter 7 (Organizing: Setting up the right buckets), it says; "In other words, your organization system is not
something that you'll necessarily create all at once, in a vacuum. It will evolve as you process your stuff and test out whether you have put everything in the best place for you."

Going back to the flowchart we have the following:
  • Trash
  • Someday Maybe / Tickler / Hold for Review
  • Reference (retrievable when required)
  • Calendar for the hard landscape
  • Next Action lists
  • Delegation / Waiting For
  • Projects
  • Project Plans
Trash is self-evident. Delete or throw away, nothing to think about here. Someday / Maybe, placed in a Notebook in Evernote. Reference however is a bit more tricky. When I look at my current references I am a bit angry at myself. I don't have the hard clean edges I want (or perhaps need) to have, so effectively my references (multiple lists in Evernote) is just a mess. Viewing it now I see things I actually regard as project support, which should be with projects and not in a general refence system. The truth is that I am a bit project-oriented as I talked about earlier, so having a general reference system is actually creating more overhead. This is where being too organized is more detrimental than positive. When you start having a reference for lyrics, lots of quotes and other things you never really look at (though having a few quotes here and there is not bad), it is essentially clogging up your system.

So what goes in there and what does not? As little as possible and probably nothing. I have no need for a general A-Z reference system in notes as everything that is important is related to a project. Other references are basically email and just files, placed in Dropbox or my email client. No need for an additional general reference system just to have one in Evernote. I looked through the reference system I had in place, deleted a bunch of nonsense (I was even keeping a note on all kinds of webshops, when I know I can easily find it by a search if needed) and sent the rest back to my inbox.

Okay. I am sorted on references since I now have a better understanding on what kind of references I actually get and what to do with them. Having a general reference system drives me to accumulate lots of stuff I don't need just to utilize the system itself. It becomes a waste of time and a great source for frustration.

Calender, on iCloud, end of story. Next Action lists and Waiting For goes on iCloud Reminders.

Now, the big question: Projects and Project plans. The GTD way for a list of projects was an actual list of projects:
  • Get my car fixed
  • Move to new office
  • Establish my own company
  • Research computer hardware
  • Set up personal finances oversight
In the GTD book David Allen writes: "The "Projects" list is not meant to hold plans or details about your project themselves, nor should you try to keep it arranged by priority, size or urgency - it's just a comprehensive index of your open loops."

This never really made complete sense to me. It blew my fuse because it felt redundant having a list of projects, and project support materials separated, which I see in my world as project plans or essential to project plans. Now, this is how I function and adhering to GTDs version would does not make sense for me. It can again be that I view project support differently than others, but I have a big problem distinguising it. Two sides of the same coin.

My version of a project encapsulates both the project itself,the plan and project support. Originally I thought about having a note per project in Evernote (under a Projects list), where I had both my intended outcome and project plans. In a way it worked wonders with small projects, but then again the problem arise with project support, not having a functioning reference system in place when dealing with larger projects.

I found that OneNote includes everything that is necessary for me in this case. For each big project I can create a new notebook. A big project is any project that requires sub-projects to finish the whole project. Everything else can go in a business or personal notebook in its respective section. In each respective section one can have project plans and project support in the same place. These notebooks can again be synced to my iPad if necessary, but with my current habits (and historical), I would never have any need for that. To summarize:
  • Big projects requiring sub-projects: Create new notebook and put sub-project in sections
  • Small projects go in a Personal or Business notebook in a respective section
  • OneNote itself serves as the project list overview
PS: One added bonus for having a personal and business notebook, would be to have 50k, 40k and 30k goals written and available at a glance when reviewing all your current projects.

I have tried and failed doing things according to the book (or maybe I actually haven't done things according to the book), but I realize that I must look at my reality. What do I need to organize, what information do I get? How do I think about projects and support? I believe that I essentially can follow the principles of GTD without necessary adhering to its "recommended" way of organizing.

If anyone have any questions, criticism or any feedback at all I am very happy to read and reply!

I'll end this the same way I started it, with the quote from Bruce Lee:
It's not the daily increase but daily decrease. Hack away at the unessential.
 
OneCoffePlease said:
In the GTD book David Allen writes: "The "Projects" list is not meant to hold plans or details about your project themselves, nor should you try to keep it arranged by priority, size or urgency - it's just a comprehensive index of your open loops."

This never really made complete sense to me. It blew my fuse because it felt redundant having a list of projects, and project support materials separated, which I see in my world as project plans or essential to project plans.

Well. I'd like to separate it all a bit more, And I also need to tell you that I am using a so-called GTD app, where some of these things are built in from the start.

I never look at my own comprehensive "projects list", because I have no need for it, but I do look at shorter subsets of it. I have five subsets, each representing either an "area" (group of areas of responsibility) or a 30 k goal ("super-project"). I like those lists a lot. They help give me perspective without drowning me. And from there I can click into any of those projects to see the actions.

As for typical project support material I would tend to agree with David Allen. I sure do not want all that stuff cluttering my action lists, but I see no harm in having discreet linkages etc to the reference material (even though I do not need or use those types of features much personally.) You could even have it all in one single app (like OneNote or Evernote etc.), but I would personally always want to be able to see my actions "naked" without reference clutter.

However, I do want to be able to see one little part of the project support material a bit more easily. The part I am talking about is those future actions that will one day sit on my Next and Waiting lists. I want to be able to see those on the same screen with my currently active project tasks in order to remember and understand the project better and more conveniently. And still I do not want them to clutter my Next and Waiting lists. I only want them visible when I view that particular project's actions. So that is also how I do it in my app. Obviously (perhaps not?) I only include tasks that will be on my own lists one day - if I have a big collaborative project plan somewhere then I keep that whole plan tucked away along with the rest of my project support material - I only copy those little bits that I personally will need to do or wait for.
 
Thanks for dropping in. I might have been unable to properly describe the system. As of now my Projects list is simply:
  • Big projects: Created as a single notebook in OneNote with subdvisions
  • Small projects: Placed inside a Personal or Business notebook in OneNote
My Personal and Business notebooks contain 50k, 40k, 30k and 20k Horizon of Focus as its first page. This way I am faced with why I am doing things and what my goals are in general, it keeps me focused. That combined with a form of daily fill, is very powerful for me.

The projects contain plans, support, reference and resources. Sometimes directly or linked to files. Those never go on the Next Actions lists at all. I actually changed the language in my own system to reflect my own perception regarding projects. Small projects are seen as commitments instead of projects. This is because I tend to overly plan things if I see it as a project. I still plan it out, but I use different language doing so.

Here is an example of a single big project:


A big project will start with the NPM model. Figuring out why the project is being done in the first place, then outcome visioning and brainstorming (usually done in a mind map, exported as an image and added). Each large section of the project is of course a sub-project, which get its own subdivision i.e Sub-Project 1, 2 etc. These are identified during the brainstorming process. Mind mapping is done in a separate program and linked in the brainstorming section.

This way enables me to keep my Next Actions, Agendas and Waiting For lists pristine and separated (in iCloud Reminders). I can also scan through my projects, what I feel is most important, while also looking at my actions to decide what to do. It is a way of keeping me on track and focused. Doing it in the morning so I do not walk around «blind» all day.

Here is my workflow diagram for it (made in yEd):

Hopefully this gave a better overview and clarity about my system.
 
OneCoffePlease said:
This never really made complete sense to me. It blew my fuse because it felt redundant having a list of projects, and project support materials separated, which I see in my world as project plans or essential to project plans. Now, this is how I function and adhering to GTDs version would does not make sense for me. It can again be that I view project support differently than others, but I have a big problem distinguising it. Two sides of the same coin.

I'm probably missing something, but I'm confused about this. If, say, you have Project A, and Project A has forty-eight pages of project support material associated with it, then surely you wouldn't want to page through all forty-eight pages before you get to Project B, and another fifteen pages before you get to Project C, and so on? I would want to be able to see something that reminds me of all my projects, all at once.

If you're saying that Projects A, B, C, and so on each have a file folder (either electronic or paper), and that you can see all the project names by riffling quickly through the folders and looking at the labels on the tabs, that makes more sense to me.

And in fact that's more or less how OmniFocus does it. You can see a list of projects, but if you click a project, you immediately see that project's actions--and if you stored notes and files in OmniFocus, you could see them, too. So the "file tab" serves as both a list entry and a file tab.

Is that what you're saying--that you see no need to sit down and look at the names of your tabs or files or whatever and type/write them into a completely separate list, when you got the "list" just by looking at them?
 
Since my system is digital I do not have an issue going through 48 pages before getting to another project. I see that there might be an issue with the attachments, which is probably causing the confusion here. Your second paragrah is essentially what my digital system looks like.

I see the list of my project by just opening OneNote. Your assumption in the last paragraph is entirely correct. Some people can see it potentially getting out of hand, but if I have too many projects I am probably trying to do too much at the same time.

I will try again to attach the images I previously uploaded:

First the big project with sub-projects:
One_Note.jpg


And my workflow:
Workflow_diagram_GTD.jpg

I checked this post in Chrome and all attachments work there, but not in Internet Explorer and Firefox for anyone interested.
 
Top