• Our deepest thanks to the many GTD enthusiasts who have posted in and read this forum over the years. Because use has been steadily declining in recent years, we have reluctantly decided to make this forum a read-only reference archive. There is an active GTD discussion community on the new GTD Connect. Copy/paste this link to get a free trial: https://bit.ly/4hYicYV We still offer a range of other free resources for GTD enthusiasts at: https://gettingthingsdone.com/resources/

Define outcome success story

I was doing my WR. There were some projects that didn't move for a week or two and I wasn't interested in doing them. Then I decided to think of outcome im more details. For example, I had a project "Sign agreement with XYZ company". The outcome was: contract signed. But "why" wasn't clearly defined. It was something like "to have exculivity for XYZ prodcuts". But that didn't motivate me to do the project. I redefined it as "to help my friend at XYZ to keep good relationship with him". And that's worked! Now when the outcome defined in a way I want to do it I really want to move that project further!

Regards,
Eugene.
 
Defining Outcomes - what's in it for me?

Whenever I am defining a project and it's successful outcome I always ask the question "What's in it for me?". This allows me to remember to visualise a successful outcome which will motivate me to complete the project. Like most people I have a tendency to take on too many projects, asking this question can be helpful in deciding if you really want to commit to the project.
 
Thanks for the great story. I admit that my last two years have been mostly spent getting my head around "What's the next action?" I feel like the next two could be around "What's the successful outcome?" I find the depth fascinating.
 
7Breaths;48193 said:
Whenever I am defining a project and it's successful outcome I always ask the question "What's in it for me?"
I appreciate your point, and this is usually my (default) thought. I'm trying to work on the perspective Eugene suggests: What's in it for *them*? :-)
 
Top