Good Luck in Graduate School!
chazmanT said:
Does anyone have advice on implementing GTD (or any lifehacks, for that matter) in an academic science career? I about to start my journey through graduate school in physics, and I would appreciate any input. Thanks!
I have been director of graduate studies in my physics department for several years, and doing GTD for quite a while too. Some thoughts:
GTD works very well for administrative and teaching duties without much customization. You have responsibilities, and you use your calendar and lists as tools. One important tip: always have something to write on when you interact with students. A small notepad, index cards, whatever. You can be very organized and effective here, except..
In your first two years of graduate school, you will probably take three classes a semester, and spend somewhere around 10-15 hours per week on each of them in a normal week. You will likely have a weekly colloquium that you should attend, and more specialized weekly seminars as you move into research.Our graduate program specifies that TA's should spend up to 15 hours per week on TA duties, so it is not hard to get to 60 hours or more.
Take notes everywhere. You will take notes in class, of course, but you will also benefit from taking notes as you read. It is possible to expand one page of a graduate physics text into four or more pages of calculation. Most people find such notes have little lasting value, but some keep them for years. Many people use a separate notebook for notes on talks they hear. Some system to manage paper is essential.
Your own education and research will require most of your time and energy. Frankly, research is just difficult. A lot of information is thrust upon you, mostly disorganized, and you have to build a mental map of what is known for yourself. Ideally, you will find a way to fill in or extend the map. The GTD book does not devote too many pages to project thinking, but the material is helpful. Mindmaps and outlines work well for me. DA says that no project looks exactly like another, and that is certainly true in research.
Good Luck!