Has anyone . . . GTD Attractiveness . . . hi there

G

gtdstudente

Registered
GTDer's

Big day tomorrow: The Weekly Review

Has anyone done anything to their GTD system to make it all the more Attractive?

One of the major ways on this end for the GTD system to be as attractive as possible is for it to be as low-maintenance as possible with as few moving parts as possible and only encompassing as many moving parts as necessary with as much GTD skill and GTD system 'space' as possible for optimal capacity to appropriately engage with life's random uncertainties . . . what a worthy GTD aspiration?

The uncommitted conclusion from the humble perspective above regarding GTD system attractiveness:
Focus on the GTD system being as E A S Y as possible vs. thinking unrealistic 'simplicity' is key to attractiveness . . . again, even if 'simplicity' is high-maintenance it will repel ?

Thank you very much
 
Last edited:
There's a fine line between "attractive hazard" and just fiddling aesthetically/organizationally. It's easy to put a lot of time into very little utility value. It's closely related to the "if I get a pelaton, THEN i'll start working out" or "with the RIGHT pen and notebook, then i'll start writing the book" bulls**t promises that you make to yourself. :-)
 
gtdstudente said:
GTDer's

Big day tomorrow: The Weekly Review

Has anyone done anything to their GTD system to make it all the more Attractive?

One of the major ways on this end for the GTD system to be as attractive as possible is for it to be as low-maintenance as possible with as few moving parts as possible and only encompassing as many moving parts as necessary with as much GTD skill and GTD system 'space' as possible for optimal capacity to appropriately engage with life's random uncertainties . . . what a worthy GTD aspiration?

The uncommitted conclusion from the humble perspective above regarding GTD system attractiveness:
Focus on the GTD system being as E A S Y as possible vs. thinking unrealistic 'simplicity' is key to attractiveness . . . again, even if 'simplicity' is high-maintenance it will repel ?

Thank you very much
Click to expand...
Keep the GTD system simple, but don’t overdo it. Fewer parts = fewer issues. I added a widget on my home screen that shows my tasks, and it’s way more enjoyable to use. Not everything has to be super straightforward, as long as it works. ;)
 
Charles102 said:
Keep the GTD system simple, but don’t overdo it. Fewer parts = fewer issues. I added a widget on my home screen that shows my tasks, and it’s way more enjoyable to use. Not everything has to be super straightforward, as long as it works. ;)
Click to expand...
@Charles102

Indeed, love the GTD system in general to simply have as few moving parts as necessary; and in particular be as easy to maintain as possible

Thank you very much sir
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top