Is it good practise to have 2 "at computer" lists of next actions?
Since I do so much at the computer, I like to put the hot, urgent or important next actions in "at computer 1" and the ones that can be done at a lower priority in "at computer 2".
Is there a better way to do what I'm trying to accomplish? Is this an established need or is there a recommended methodology?
Is there a recommended terminology to use, so I don't have to use 1 and 2?
Sonja
Since I do so much at the computer, I like to put the hot, urgent or important next actions in "at computer 1" and the ones that can be done at a lower priority in "at computer 2".
Is there a better way to do what I'm trying to accomplish? Is this an established need or is there a recommended methodology?
Is there a recommended terminology to use, so I don't have to use 1 and 2?
Sonja