H
HoD
Guest
Hi,
My job is somewhat of a mail-manager (a manager of his mail not people)
these days. My inbox is full and emptying is not even a goal anymore... :-?
I am using a basic version of waiting for macro's and NA's (tasks).
However the NA i am using limits to 1, @computer because that's what i do most in combination with @waiting for because of the reminders.
The other Na's are never or hardly used.
I am wondering why i put all my mail in a NA(task) @computer and after doing so switching to it and work on thes NA's (tasks).
The only purpose of this is trying to empy my inbox.
Is there an easier way of GTD'ing with 1 or at the most 2 NA's?
mvg
Jerry
My job is somewhat of a mail-manager (a manager of his mail not people)
these days. My inbox is full and emptying is not even a goal anymore... :-?
I am using a basic version of waiting for macro's and NA's (tasks).
However the NA i am using limits to 1, @computer because that's what i do most in combination with @waiting for because of the reminders.
The other Na's are never or hardly used.
I am wondering why i put all my mail in a NA(task) @computer and after doing so switching to it and work on thes NA's (tasks).
The only purpose of this is trying to empy my inbox.
Is there an easier way of GTD'ing with 1 or at the most 2 NA's?
mvg
Jerry