Long post on meeting varied responsibilities
phredrows said:
I'm a minister with a staff. I have a variety of deadlines, manage people, write articles, have a variety of projects and tasks. This is why I need GTD's insights.
...
There are articles and things I need to write and I never know how long they will take. I have other projects that require different skills. How long does it take to write an essay? How long does it take to prepare a seminar? Do I block out a morning, an entire day?
I'm a professor at a university, and I have lots of different responsibiliities too. I don't think this is comprehensive, but for me there are four kinds of things requiring my attention:
1) Stuff that I really want to do, the best part of my job. For me this is mostly research, but there are also things like innovative courses I want to develop. Mostly I need time and thought for these, but I do some work with people committed to the same or similar goals.
2) Stuff that I really want done, but I need or want other people to help. Getting buy-in can be time-consuming, and may require a lot of effort. I may need to pick my battles carefully.
3) Stuff that just has to be done, in a timely manner, period. I have lectures every week. A minister has to give sermons, marry couples, bury the dead. Emergencies happen.
4) Stuff that has to be done to keep all the balls in the air. Paperwork, meetings, delegating, follow-up, assessment. This kind of work can have an ebb and flow to it.
GTD sees all of this as stuff that needs to be done, but not necessarily prioritized. For the stuff in category 3), I think habit and good use of calendars is crucial. I usually prepare my MWF morning lectures the night before. Depending on the class, I know it takes me to 2-3 hours to prepare a one-hour lecture. Because I have been teaching for some time, I know that I can occasionally take some short cuts in preparation, but not always.
If I have something that will interfere with that routine, I have to see it on my calendar far enough ahead to plan around it. If an emergency comes up, I have to know what is truly scheduled for that day, and what can wait.
The stuff in category 1) also requires habit and discipline. Setting aside time every day for the most important stuff is crucial. A one-hour colloquium (a presentation to all the faculty and graduate students in a department) will take me tens of hours to develop. It can't be done in a day, and taking a week to do it is impractical. I find that 1-2 hours of concentrated work at a stretch is plenty.
I try to limit the stuff in category 2) to things that are truly important to me, and that I stand a reasonable chance of succeeding in. Not dropping the ball is the key to most things in category 4).
Is the distinction between these categories made in my next-action lists? No, but they are deeply embedded in the process by which I make choices about what to do next.