manynothings
Registered
Hello,
This has been the topic of countless other gtd posts, but I think there is something about it that isn't delved deeply into.
I use GTD digitally, so I have the convenience of linking actions with projects while being able to put actions in context lists. However, I see proponents of not linking actions with projects often talk about how doing so makes their system more familiar to them through the Weekly Review. This could seem like something I could implement into my system (for Project in Project List, think about next actions before going to the list of actions for project, rather than directly going to that list), but I'm not quite sure what doing so offers. May someone who doesn't link actions with projects please explain what this "increased familiarity" means and implies?
Thanks,
manynothings.
This has been the topic of countless other gtd posts, but I think there is something about it that isn't delved deeply into.
I use GTD digitally, so I have the convenience of linking actions with projects while being able to put actions in context lists. However, I see proponents of not linking actions with projects often talk about how doing so makes their system more familiar to them through the Weekly Review. This could seem like something I could implement into my system (for Project in Project List, think about next actions before going to the list of actions for project, rather than directly going to that list), but I'm not quite sure what doing so offers. May someone who doesn't link actions with projects please explain what this "increased familiarity" means and implies?
Thanks,
manynothings.