A new GTD app from a longtime practitioner — looking for ~10 beta testers

Hey all — longtime member here (since 2014, mostly lurking), and I'm finally posting again because I have something I want to share with this group specifically, and I want your honest reactions before I take it more public.

Quick disclosure up front: I'm the founder of the thing I'm about to describe. Posting in the tools section because that's what it's for, but if a mod thinks I should pull it, just tell me and I will.

A bit about me first so you can calibrate. I've been doing GTD since the book came out in 2001. Re-read it every couple of years, took the official training when David Co came through Seattle, and ran informal lunch-and-learn sessions for my Microsoft teammates over the years — not because anyone asked me to, but because they kept asking what I was doing in that task manager always open on my second monitor. In 2014, I co-founded GTDNext and ran it with my co-founder for seven years. Sold my share at the end of 2020. Some of you may have used it. Good run, lots of lessons, and by the end I had a long list of things I'd do differently if I were starting over.

That someday / maybe the project is now an app. It's called Mind Like Water.

The thing that drove me to build it: I've used pretty much every tool out there over the last 25 years — Things, OmniFocus, Nirvana, Todoist, Notion, Obsidian, Roam, Logseq, plus GTDNext, plus a dozen others. They all do something well. None of them treats tasks and notes as equal partners. Task managers bolt notes on as a textarea. Note tools bolt tasks on as a checkbox. The thinking part of a project and the doing part end up in different worlds, and you spend half your life gluing them together. That's the gap I'm trying to close first.

A few specifics on the GTD plumbing. Capture defaults to Inbox — that's where most things should land before you've decided what they are — but you can promote on the way in if you already know. Weekly Review is a first-class view, not just a piece of advice in the docs; it walks the standard checklist (inbox, stalled projects, overdue, stale next actions, someday/maybe, completed since last review) with an optional AI pass for the "what hasn't moved?" question. Areas of Focus is mode-switching — set your active area and every view narrows to it, not a color-coded tag you have to filter for. Tasks and notes share the same tag tree, the same search, and the same area scope. And there's a deep keyboard shortcut layer for the things you do all day.

And then a few things you won't find in most GTD apps. Notes are actually notes — a real editor with wikilinks, backlinks, and @-mentions; a note can reference a task, and the task shows the note in its "Referenced in" section, so your project's thinking lives next to its doing. There's an opt-in AI triage layer that watches Inbox and proposes the area, project, due date, status, and tags from natural-language entries — you accept what's right and reject what isn't. The point isn't to think for you; it's to make the boring clarification typing disappear. Voice capture (Shift+N) lets you dictate a stream-of-consciousness brain dump that gets transcribed and parsed into structured tasks for you to review before anything saves — reflective bits get appended to your daily page automatically. And every account has a private email address: forward anything to it and it lands in your Inbox as a task (or a note if you prefix the subject with n:).

It's not GTD-inspired-but-loose. It's not a "personal OS." It reads your Google Calendar so today's meetings show up alongside your tasks, but it doesn't try to be your calendar — it can't create or move events. It's a strict take on GTD with notes treated equally.

Here's what I'm actually asking. I'm putting together a small beta — about 10 people from this forum — to try it before I go more public. If you're up for it, you get six months of Pro free, and after that you're locked into founding-member pricing forever ($5/mo instead of the public $8). I've set up a small private Discord where I'm hanging out with the cohort, so you'd have a direct line to me for bugs, ideas, questions, whatever.

What I'd want in return: actually use it for at least two weeks, and tell me when something's wrong. Especially when I've got GTD wrong. That's the feedback I'm most after.

If you want in, DM me with a sentence or two about your current GTD setup and what's frustrating about it. First ten get a spot.

If you'd rather just look at the landing page first, it's at https://mindlikewater.app - But I'd rather have you in the beta.

— James
 
Hey all — longtime member here (since 2014, mostly lurking), and I'm finally posting again because I have something I want to share with this group specifically, and I want your honest reactions before I take it more public.

Quick disclosure up front: I'm the founder of the thing I'm about to describe. Posting in the tools section because that's what it's for, but if a mod thinks I should pull it, just tell me and I will.

A bit about me first so you can calibrate. I've been doing GTD since the book came out in 2001. Re-read it every couple of years, took the official training when David Co came through Seattle, and ran informal lunch-and-learn sessions for my Microsoft teammates over the years — not because anyone asked me to, but because they kept asking what I was doing in that task manager always open on my second monitor. In 2014, I co-founded GTDNext and ran it with my co-founder for seven years. Sold my share at the end of 2020. Some of you may have used it. Good run, lots of lessons, and by the end I had a long list of things I'd do differently if I were starting over.

That someday / maybe the project is now an app. It's called Mind Like Water.

The thing that drove me to build it: I've used pretty much every tool out there over the last 25 years — Things, OmniFocus, Nirvana, Todoist, Notion, Obsidian, Roam, Logseq, plus GTDNext, plus a dozen others. They all do something well. None of them treats tasks and notes as equal partners. Task managers bolt notes on as a textarea. Note tools bolt tasks on as a checkbox. The thinking part of a project and the doing part end up in different worlds, and you spend half your life gluing them together. That's the gap I'm trying to close first.

A few specifics on the GTD plumbing. Capture defaults to Inbox — that's where most things should land before you've decided what they are — but you can promote on the way in if you already know. Weekly Review is a first-class view, not just a piece of advice in the docs; it walks the standard checklist (inbox, stalled projects, overdue, stale next actions, someday/maybe, completed since last review) with an optional AI pass for the "what hasn't moved?" question. Areas of Focus is mode-switching — set your active area and every view narrows to it, not a color-coded tag you have to filter for. Tasks and notes share the same tag tree, the same search, and the same area scope. And there's a deep keyboard shortcut layer for the things you do all day.

And then a few things you won't find in most GTD apps. Notes are actually notes — a real editor with wikilinks, backlinks, and @-mentions; a note can reference a task, and the task shows the note in its "Referenced in" section, so your project's thinking lives next to its doing. There's an opt-in AI triage layer that watches Inbox and proposes the area, project, due date, status, and tags from natural-language entries — you accept what's right and reject what isn't. The point isn't to think for you; it's to make the boring clarification typing disappear. Voice capture (Shift+N) lets you dictate a stream-of-consciousness brain dump that gets transcribed and parsed into structured tasks for you to review before anything saves — reflective bits get appended to your daily page automatically. And every account has a private email address: forward anything to it and it lands in your Inbox as a task (or a note if you prefix the subject with n:).

It's not GTD-inspired-but-loose. It's not a "personal OS." It reads your Google Calendar so today's meetings show up alongside your tasks, but it doesn't try to be your calendar — it can't create or move events. It's a strict take on GTD with notes treated equally.

Here's what I'm actually asking. I'm putting together a small beta — about 10 people from this forum — to try it before I go more public. If you're up for it, you get six months of Pro free, and after that you're locked into founding-member pricing forever ($5/mo instead of the public $8). I've set up a small private Discord where I'm hanging out with the cohort, so you'd have a direct line to me for bugs, ideas, questions, whatever.

What I'd want in return: actually use it for at least two weeks, and tell me when something's wrong. Especially when I've got GTD wrong. That's the feedback I'm most after.

If you want in, DM me with a sentence or two about your current GTD setup and what's frustrating about it. First ten get a spot.

If you'd rather just look at the landing page first, it's at https://mindlikewater.app - But I'd rather have you in the beta.

— James
Hey James — first, respect. Shipping a GTD-native tool with that level of thoughtfulness is not trivial. You clearly understand the methodology deeply, and it shows in the design choices (Weekly Review as a first-class citizen, Areas of Focus as a mode, etc.). That already puts you ahead of 90% of “GTD-inspired” apps.

I’m interested — I’ll DM you.

Now, since you explicitly asked for honest feedback, here’s my take:

What you’ve built feels like a very strong “pre-agentic” GTD system — meaning:

  • It optimizes capture → clarify → organize → review → engage really well
  • It reduces friction in clarification (AI triage, voice parsing — nice touch)
  • It closes the historical gap between notes and tasks

But fundamentally, it still assumes that:

the human remains the primary executor of the workflow

And that’s where I think the ground is shifting.

Where I see the gap (and opportunity)

With what Anthropic and OpenAI are shipping now (tool use, agents, memory, orchestration), the frontier is moving from:

“help me manage my work” → to “help me do my work”

Concretely, a next-gen GTD system could:
  • Not just suggest tags → decide and execute routing autonomously
  • Not just surface “stalled projects” → actively chase Waiting Fors
  • Not just clarify inputs → draft replies, create deliverables, trigger workflows
  • Not just support Weekly Review → run it continuously in the background
In GTD terms:
- We’re moving from supporting the 5 steps…
- to partially automating parts of Clarify, Organize, and even Engage

The tension (and your positioning)

To be fair — and important:

David Allen’s model is explicitly about externalizing thinking to regain control and perspective, not outsourcing responsibility.

So there’s a real design choice here:

Option A — Purist GTD (what you’re doing well)
  • Tool supports thinking
  • Human stays fully in charge
  • System builds trust and clarity

Option B — Agentic GTD (emerging)
  • Tool starts acting on your behalf
  • System reduces cognitive load further
  • Risk: loss of clarity / trust if poorly designed
My honest synthesis


Right now, your app is:
- Best-in-class GTD system (post-Todoist / OmniFocus era)


But the next wave is:
- GTD systems that behave like junior operators

And I don’t yet see that layer in your product.

If I were pushing your roadmap (provocative on purpose)

I would explore:
  1. Agent layer on top of Inbox
    • Not just triage → propose + simulate full processing outcomes
  2. Waiting For automation
    • Detect stalled loops → suggest / draft follow-ups automatically
  3. Project co-pilot
    • Apply Natural Planning Model dynamically (purpose → outcome → next actions)
  4. Background Weekly Review
    • Continuous drift detection instead of weekly ritual
Bottom line

You’ve built something serious — and rare:
- A tool that actually respects GTD structurally


Now the question is:
- Do you want to stay the best GTD app
- Or become the first GTD agent system

Big difference.

Happy to test and give you sharp feedback in the beta.

All the best /Yannick
 
Top