As the GTD experts often kindly say. . . .

G

gtdstudente

Registered
As the GTD experts often kindly say:

"You don't have problems . . . you have Projects [outcome thinking . . . what does done look like]"

Kind of likewise?

Projects are "Figuring Out(s)" . . . like 'figuring-out' the Next Action

As you see GTD fit. . . .
 
Last edited:
Not to discourage you, but sometimes determining "what it should look like in the end" is much easier than determining the path to "what it should look like in the end".
 
That’s an interesting way to frame it. “Figuring out” really does capture the spirit of how GTD encourages constant clarity. It’s like every project starts as a question we’re slowly answering through each Next Action.
 
Palgent said:
That’s an interesting way to frame it. “Figuring out” really does capture the spirit of how GTD encourages constant clarity. It’s like every project starts as a question we’re slowly answering through each Next Action.
Click to expand...
Project: Explaining the quantum theory of gravity.
Next action: Er..., um ..., well ... ;)
 
Tom_Hagen said:
Project: Explaining the quantum theory of gravity.
Next action: Er..., um ..., well ... ;)
Click to expand...
What would you like to know? How to quantize the standard Einstein-Hilbert action? How to start from flat-space spin-2 perturbations of the metric tensor and go from there? Renormalization of gravity? Maybe an explanation of Hawking radiation from black holes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top