As the GTD experts often kindly say. . . .

Tom_Hagen said:
I agree. Faith must be rational. Here I recommend the encyclical "Fides et Ratio". As for philosophy, it seems to me that it asks somewhat broader questions. "What is it?" is just one of its branches, i.e. ontology. I would also add that science answers completely different questions, such as: "How does it work / function" and absolutely does not answer the questions "For what purpose" because it operates in a completely different cognitive field than faith.

It seems to me that we are already quite far from the subject of this group :))
Click to expand...
@Tom_Hagen

Thank you very much for your healthy GTD forum feedback, which seems to be very much about creating subjective personal systems in an objective manner in order to develop to one's particular subjective concerns in regards to Horizons, Objectivity, Purpose, Principles, Focus(es), etc. as maturely respectful and productively as possible through a good forum such as the GTDforum in humble attempts to achieve the aim of Mind Like Water without overreacting or under reacting as one can imperfectly best muster with as much sensitivity as reasonably possible for the peaceful well-being of others for developing multi-facet GTD skills ?

Thank you very much

As you see GTD fit. . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top