Finding why I don't trust my system

I'm interrupting my weekly review to bring you this confession. I don't trust my system.

David has often commented in his podcasts that if you're not using the system it is because you don't trust it. I still find myself prioritising and remembering what to do next from memory rather than my lists. It would be once a fortnight, at best, that I go into a list of next actions to see what I can do. My most useful list is @waiting for by far.

I am comfortable that I have my 10,000ft projects covered. The life goals aren't there yet. I mention that because I don't think that's the reason, rather I keep working on the last thing in the pile. Despite my intentions I don't seem to be able to finish A, look at list, select B, finish B. Instead I finish A, finish Z, finish D

Back to David's comment about trusting my system. I know it has the placeholders for much of what I have to remember (have you noticed like I have that I'm using much and most), and when I go back into it each week I've ticked off the major items as I would have prioritised them. It seems wrong to not be looking at the list each time. It gets worse in weeks like this where I have a backlog to process, however small, butting up against some big items.

Thought: I do the little things immediately though they usually take longer than 2 minutes in order to quieten interruptions and create space for the bigger things to occur. Then I react to the pressure of the big things having not occurred! A big thing is usually something that requires 2-3 hours to think and reflect. On further thinking a big thing is big because it is really something that I believe is fundamentally important.

I would benefit from hearing the experiences of others. This is not a technical implementation issue but an emotional one.

David

Update:
In the time since originally posting I've:
  • Caught myself thinking, "I'll just do the minutes of the board meeting so that I have time to process my conference notes"
  • Decided to put the board minutes aside and process my conference notes which I need to have organised for a meeting with the chairman tomorrow.
  • Begun processing my conference notes
  • Relaxed

That says it all.
 
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I've often found myself thinking similar things.

quantumgardener;54072 said:
Thought: I do the little things immediately though they usually take longer than 2 minutes in order to quieten interruptions and create space for the bigger things to occur. Then I react to the pressure of the big things having not occurred! A big thing is usually something that requires 2-3 hours to think and reflect. On further thinking a big thing is big because it is really something that I believe is fundamentally important.

This hits home for me - almost every morning I try to "clear space" by doing little things that take more than 2 minutes, so often I don't really get started working off my lists in a calm state till about 11 or 11.30 (I start at 9).

It's like without even noticing I'm doing it, I launch into doing smallish tasks, thinking "I'll just get this out of the way".

I think this is perhaps just a bad habit though, so I'm hoping it can be changed by getting sufficiently annoyed at myself for doing it that I'll break out of it and establish some better habits.
 
This is probably the hardest part of GTD - forming the new habits. And one of them is - you guessed it - the habit of working from your lists, not your head, stacks, emotions, urgency, interruptions, ...

The good news is it sounds like you've still got some of the main elements in place (e.g., Waiting For). So try this: Use a Kaizen "small steps" approach: Make yourself look at your actions list(s) just one time every day, no exceptions. Just look at it. After some time this might get you a step further - pick one action to work on. Of course this depends on having the list up-to-date, which is another habit.

What GTD practitioners sometimes don't realize early on is it's a process of mastery. Like learning a new instrument, you shouldn't expect to sit down and start playing right away. (George Leonard's book Mastery helped me to understand this.)

Good luck and keep us informed!
 
Agreed with cornell. It's a long process; longer for some. And some parts of the system just take time to stick.

Absolutely agreed to work off your GTD lists just once per day, for now. And increase from there.
 
cornell;54085 said:
The good news is it sounds like you've still got some of the main elements in place (e.g., Waiting For). So try this: Use a Kaizen "small steps" approach: Make yourself look at your actions list(s) just one time every day, no exceptions. Just look at it. After some time this might get you a step further - pick one action to work on. Of course this depends on having the list up-to-date, which is another habit.

My list is up to date so I'm covered there. I'll try the one step at a time approach on my task list and see how it goes.

cornell;54085 said:
What GTD practitioners sometimes don't realize early on is it's a process of mastery. Like learning a new instrument, you shouldn't expect to sit down and start playing right away. (George Leonard's book Mastery helped me to understand this.)

This I am aware of as I've been a traveller, on and off, on the GTD road for four years now. It's good for you to remind me of that. Usually with mastery there is a master to learn from. When the questions come to mind it's good to ask GTD Connect for guidance.

David
 
rangi500;54082 said:
It's like without even noticing I'm doing it, I launch into doing smallish tasks, thinking "I'll just get this out of the way".

I think this is perhaps just a bad habit though, so I'm hoping it can be changed by getting sufficiently annoyed at myself for doing it that I'll break out of it and establish some better habits.

"Without even noticing..."

None of us can change our behaviours without being aware of what behaviours we currently have. I often delve back into some of the GTD podcasts to listen to them in a new light.

Waiting to get annoyed at yourself is perhaps not the best strategy for change. Can you declare publicly what new skill you would like to develop and by when? That will save you getting annoyed. It's difficult to be motivated from a position of frustration.

David
 
What's wrong with not checking your NA list for every action?

quantumgardener;54072 said:
I still find myself prioritising and remembering what to do next from memory rather than my lists. It would be once a fortnight, at best, that I go into a list of next actions to see what I can do.

I find that if I do my weekly reviews and my lists are current, I don't need to check my NA list for every action. Most of my NAs are related to appointments at work. Those appointments trigger the NAs and I go from there; knowing what needs to be done since I did last week's review. At the next weekly review, I check to see where I stopped with that appointment or project then note the NA for that project. And the cycle repeats. I don't check the NA list everyday. Actually, I find myself checking the lists more when I am NOT current with my weekly reviews.

So I don't see a problem with not checking the list everyday if you do your weekly reviews and have current lists.

Repeated reviews of the lists make them fresh in my memory. I can't help it that I remember lists from reviewing them on a weekly basis. I don't check my NA lists daily; but that does not mean I don't trust my system.

I guess I am trying to see why it is a problem with you? Are you not getting things done? :confused:
 
petdr;54232 said:
I find that if I do my weekly reviews and my lists are current, I don't need to check my NA list for every action. Most of my NAs are related to appointments at work. Those appointments trigger the NAs and I go from there; knowing what needs to be done since I did last week's review. At the next weekly review, I check to see where I stopped with that appointment or project then note the NA for that project. And the cycle repeats. I don't check the NA list everyday. Actually, I find myself checking the lists more when I am NOT current with my weekly reviews.

So I don't see a problem with not checking the list everyday if you do your weekly reviews and have current lists.

Repeated reviews of the lists make them fresh in my memory. I can't help it that I remember lists from reviewing them on a weekly basis. I don't check my NA lists daily; but that does not mean I don't trust my system.

I guess I am trying to see why it is a problem with you? Are you not getting things done? :confused:

That sounds like me to a T. Yet, I got to the point where I felt the balance was on the wrong side. I was getting reviews done, but not necessarily remembering the right things. Out of the original post came the recognition that I was doing small things as they came to me in order to get them done and out of the way so that I could focus on those things that needed focussing on. That was an important learning for me.
 
re: Not Trusting Your System

THE WEEKLY REVIEW
One of the keys to trusting the system is doing a complete weekly review every week no-matter-what. If you do this you'll have enough peace-of-mind to trust your choices. But the frequency and the discipline do take awhile to master. As I just recently read from the DA himself, "GTD is about getting rid of mental residue, not going faster." A good reminder. You might collect some thoughts during your weekly review about your system and how you're feeling about it; then later you can process them into projects and actions.

THE TRUTH ABOUT ANY GTD SETUP
GTD is good because it does a better job at keeping things organized than we do when we just keep it all in our heads. Hence the importance of collection and emptying our heads. But the downside is that any GTD system can never be as quick as our heads when it comes to adjusting to sudden changes on a whim. Hence the temptation to go back to trusting our head again.

Any GTD system is limited to its infrastructure - paper, palm pilot, daytimer, email, file-system, computer, etc.). Paper requires lots of reduplication, computers are notorious for abandoned software platforms, bugs or glitches. Your system will only be able to adjust as fast as its infrastructure allows and your efforts to adjust it to new demands. So a sudden bug in the productivity software you use may throw your whole system off or a life change may do the same. Either way you have to readjust. The bottom line is that life thows us curve-balls and interruptions that knock us off course sometimes -- maybe we skip a few weekly reviews, don't get anything done for a week or two to focus on a new emergency. We just have to accept it and move on. The truth is that things are no different than before the discovery of GTD -- the interruptions were there before. What *is* different, however, is that GTD is working a lot better than whatever previous system we were using and it does take some time to master.

So I think part of it is just nailing that weekly review no-matter-what every week -- especially when you're feeling overwhelmed -- and making sure to capture the things that are bothering you. And the other part is just accepting that no matter what system you use, it's going to have some limitations in helping you face the swift demands of life's circumstances.
 
Pruning Your GTD System When Overwhelmed

You may also try pruning your system down some so that you can get enough off the table and out of your inbox so you can start thinking about some of those higher levels. One thing I counsel people to do immediately before even starting the collection process is to "prune their inputs" -- what channels are flowing into your inbox that you could cut off right now? subscriptions? RSS feeds? certain people dumping piles of stuff you don't need to know? Eliminating channels like these can reduce the amount of processing time and provide you with more time to get everything else in order.
 
Amen, Todd. We in the first world live in media-soaked cultures. We have many different inputs, ranging from:

  • TV
  • Email
  • RSS feeds
  • Blogs
  • Newspapers
  • Magazines
  • Books to read
  • Voicemail
  • IM
  • Podcasts

The mind works better when decluttered. If you spend time every day on email, blogs, podcasts, etc., your mind will still be processing all that data as you try to organize.

Simplify, simplify, simplify.
 
Brent;54244 said:
Amen, Todd. We in the first world live in media-soaked cultures. We have many different inputs, ranging from:

  • TV
  • Email
  • RSS feeds
  • Blogs
  • Newspapers
  • Magazines
  • Books to read
  • Voicemail
  • IM
  • Podcasts

The mind works better when decluttered. If you spend time every day on email, blogs, podcasts, etc., your mind will still be processing all that data as you try to organize.

Simplify, simplify, simplify.

You forgot coworkers!

Pruning is a good idea and I can vouch for its effectiveness as I've done it from time to time.
David
 
Todd V;54237 said:
So I think part of it is just nailing that weekly review no-matter-what every week -- especially when you're feeling overwhelmed -- and making sure to capture the things that are bothering you. And the other part is just accepting that no matter what system you use, it's going to have some limitations in helping you face the swift demands of life's circumstances.

Todd,

Do you mean accept as in, this is where my system is now or accept as in, resign yourself to the fact that it can't improve? A cheeky question perhaps but I would like to hear your answer.

When I coach people I work with their moods and there is an important distinction between the mood of acceptance and the mood of resignation. The latter is insidious because the language hides the true belief i.e.. we say accept when we mean resign. In a mood of acceptance we acknowledge that things are the way they are. In starting this thread I accepted the limitations of my system. It's a powerful platform for moving forward. I could just as easily say the same, but do so from a mood of resignation. In other words it is what is is and there is no possibility for improvement.

GTD Connect and the broader GTD community are working together to improve and enhance GTD. In that respect we are not resigned to things being the way they are, but choose instead to take on the possibility of improvement. I have taken your comments in that spirit.

Regards,

David
 
quantumgardener;54251 said:
Do you mean accept as in, this is where my system is now or accept as in, resign yourself to the fact that it can't improve? A cheeky question perhaps but I would like to hear your answer.

I'm not Todd, but I would say that it's important to accept that the One True Perfect System does not exist. ANY system will have limitations. Trying to fix those limitations can reach a point of diminishing returns, where more time/money/effort is spent on system tweaking than on actual productive projects.

Put another way, "perfect" is the enemy of "good enough."

Katherine
 
kewms;54252 said:
I'm not Todd, but I would say that it's important to accept that the One True Perfect System does not exist. ANY system will have limitations. Trying to fix those limitations can reach a point of diminishing returns, where more time/money/effort is spent on system tweaking than on actual productive projects.

Put another way, "perfect" is the enemy of "good enough."

Katherine

Hi Katherine,

With that name you're certainly not Todd. :)

Thank you for your comment. You're right in that we create suffering for ourselves when we fail to accept something which is predominantly true for us. We can create as much suffering when we unquestioningly accept something as not possible when it is.

I felt compelled to write as I wrote earlier. I cannot explain why. Life has taught me that when I feel compelled to do something and I don't know why I'm always better off by trusting my intuition. Perhaps I sensed in Todd's post a sense of resignation. And I'll be clear here, that is what I (me, myself, David) sensed. It's not at all suggesting that's what Todd actually meant when he posted. At this time of the year I find myself reviewing my progress for the year and I've let myself down on quite a few things by not challenging them when I could have.

Acceptance of "good enough" is the enemy of "perfect" as well. I like to be able to make a choice. GTD works well because it gives us the information we need to choose in the moment.

Forgive my rantings. Looks like I've hijacked the very topic I started.

David
 
quantumgardener;54254 said:
Acceptance of "good enough" is the enemy of "perfect" as well. I like to be able to make a choice. GTD works well because it gives us the information we need to choose in the moment.

The challenge, of course, is to focus one's energy on the areas where perfection will be rewarded, and to be willing to settle for good enough elsewhere. Two old adages come to mind:
* A good plan (or system) today is better than a perfect plan tomorrow.
* (Attrib. to Mark Twain) The difference between the exactly right word and the almost right word is the difference between the lightning and the lightning bug.

Yours in thread hijacking,

Katherine
 
quantumgardener;54251 said:
Do you mean accept as in, this is where my system is now or accept as in, resign yourself to the fact that it can't improve?

When I coach people I work with their moods and there is an important distinction between the mood of acceptance and the mood of resignation. The latter is insidious because the language hides the true belief i.e.. we say accept when we mean resign. In a mood of acceptance we acknowledge that things are the way they are. In starting this thread I accepted the limitations of my system. It's a powerful platform for moving forward. I could just as easily say the same, but do so from a mood of resignation. In other words it is what is is and there is no possibility for improvement.

I concur with Katherine that "the perfect is the enemy of good enough" and that "The challenge, of course, is to focus one's energy on the areas where perfection will be rewarded." Even a black belt in the martial arts knows their limits. They -- perhaps most of all -- know their limits. And this is what allows them to focus their energy on the areas where perfection will be rewarded.

I've been doing GTD for over 4 years now and the most surprising thing after all of that time is not how much more I'm getting done (though I *am* getting more done) -- but how much more I'm collecting and processing. I often process 70-100 new thoughts a day out of my inbox; and handle an average of 70 projects and 250 actionables a week. The problem is you can always collect and process more than you can do. And at this stage in my journey I'm realizing that there is a certain place I must come to in accepting/resigning myself to that reality. In this case I think that while the system might be able to be improved upon, I might learn something new I didn't realize before, etc. the basic reality of always being able to collect and process more than I can do confronts me with a response of either denial or acceptance -- accept my own limitations (I can only do so much every day) and resign myself to the fact that this is okay.

It's a stage in the journey I think. We begin with an almost idealistic optimism that GTD will be that magic fix for us. And this optimism may be what we need to propel us into learning the habits. I remember thinking that GTD was going to solve all of my productivity woes. But eventually one moves beyond this stage -- and the youthful confidence is replaced with an aged wisdom; a wisdom that looks over the vertical and horizontal landscapes with the knowledge that, at most, it can only rule a city and not the world.

Hope that helps.
 
Learning what to ignore

Todd's post made me think of a post from Penelope Trunk I came across yesterday.

Basically covers how you can figure out what can be ignored/dropped. As Todd said, we can get so much more processed, and be more productive with our time, but there is a limit to what we can do. When we hit that limit, we then need to make some tough choices.

Cheers,

Adam
 
Todd V;54267 said:
The problem is you can always collect and process more than you can do. And at this stage in my journey I'm realizing that there is a certain place I must come to in accepting/resigning myself to that reality.

Todd, your journey sounds somewhat like mine. I've come to the point where I can collect and process without responding to each item instantly in a knee-jerk manner as a must-do, which results in anxiety and panic, but rather as an enriching part of my stock, or bank, of things I can choose from in the future (or perhaps never). (Maybe this is one way of moving more things to the S/M list??)
 
Top