Thanks for the insights into paper and keeping the connections. I've been struggling lately with my system, having used OmniFocus now for quite a while--I think while it was still in beta. I'm hitting some uncomfortable spots with it, though (Someday/Maybe lists, project templates, collection sorts of lists like "Books to read", "Gift ideas", etc.). So, I've been tracking down two paths--looking at other systems that are more rooted in an online Office 2.0 approach (e.g., Nozbe, Toodledo, etc.) while also hearing DA's words over and over in the podcasts "more people are going retro" to paper. Paper, the ultimate in flexibility. But, being a computer geek, I've also liked the digital experience of having that cross-reference between the horizontal of contexts and the vertical of projects. I can layout a project plan with an outcome defined and a series of NAs and OmniFocus feeds them to me in my lists automatically. But with the perks of digital come the constraints of the application and how it works. Sorry, I'm rambling my thoughts out here. Thanks again for the insights. I'll continue to walk with this project for awhile.