• Our deepest thanks to the many GTD enthusiasts who have posted in and read this forum over the years. Because use has been steadily declining in recent years, we have reluctantly decided to make this forum a read-only reference archive. There is an active GTD discussion community on the new GTD Connect. Copy/paste this link to get a free trial: https://bit.ly/4hYicYV We still offer a range of other free resources for GTD enthusiasts at: https://gettingthingsdone.com/resources/

Getting Things Done and Myers-Briggs Types

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheRazor
  • Start date Start date
T

TheRazor

Guest
This is going to be a bit controversial, but I wanted the opinions of experienced GTD users about this:

Do you think GTD is the best overall organizational system for everyone? If you are familiar with the Myers-Briggs types, the last letter in the personality type system is J (Judging) or P (Perceiving). I believe Judgers will do very well with GTD, while Preceivers will have a hard time and may be better suited to some other type of system.

Thoughts?
 
Or else...

P (Perceiving). I believe Judgers will do very well with GTD, while Preceivers will have a hard time and may be better suited to some other type of system.

On the other hand, Perceivers have this nice open-ended list of Next Actions for as many projects as they like, instead of a confining prioritized To-Do List. It has a minimalist priority scheme to keep them at least in Earth orbit (Hard landscape/scheduled, Next Action, Someday/Maybe). They are encouraged to capture everything that comes into their heads. What system could be better for a Perceiver?
 
Different strokes...

TheRazor said:
This is going to be a bit controversial, but I wanted the opinions of experienced GTD users about this:

Do you think GTD is the best overall organizational system for everyone?
Thoughts?
Click to expand...

I don't think there is any one system that is best for everyone. Different people respond to different things. I think GTD is very good and I've seen it work very well for a lot of people, but I don't think it will necessarily work for everybody.
 
I'm a strong perceiver and I love GTD because I don't have to structure my life - I can do as I want in the moment and know that I am making choices from a complete list of things to do. That's the difficulty I've always encountered with other time management paths. This gives me as base from which to operate without being too concrete.
 
]On the other hand, Perceivers have this nice open-ended list of Next Actions for as many projects as they like, instead of a confining prioritized To-Do List. It has a minimalist priority scheme to keep them at least in Earth orbit (Hard landscape/scheduled, Next Action, Someday/Maybe). They are encouraged to capture everything that comes into their heads. What system could be better for a Perceiver?
Click to expand...

I agree... while I do have to be somewhat rigorous in collecting and processing, the actual *doing* can be very intuitive and flowing.
 
pageta said:
I'm a strong perceiver and I love GTD because I don't have to structure my life - I can do as I want in the moment and know that I am making choices from a complete list of things to do. That's the difficulty I've always encountered with other time management paths. This gives me as base from which to operate without being too concrete.
Click to expand...

I agree, I am the same. I am a strong perceiver as well and GTD has been changing my life ever since I started implementing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top