Interesting experiment - Number of active projects

I also prefer one next action per project.

I find that most projects have multiple possible pathways, and multiple independent threads that could be followed concurrently. My logical conclusion was that I should populate my action lists with as many as I could think of. However, this led me to procrastination. When in my calls list, I would put off the call. The call would be better after I had run the errand. Then while running errands, I would hold off on a purchase because it would be better to talk to a collaborator first. This sort of procrastination held me back on many projects.

Now, I realise what I was doing was avoiding making a choice. Because of this, when making a next action decision, I look for the single next action that will progress the project. If there are multiple possibilities, then I make a choice.

Importantly, when I look at my lists and see actions, I know that those actions are required (not optional) to progress a project.

This works well for me for most of my projects. I do have one or two that have large independent strands that have a next action each.
Usage of board view like in Todoist for has resolved this. One column for NA and only one card in that column. All the rest in into second column “Defer”. And in 3rd column all my @WF. Project template in place for any new project I create.
 
Top