Why?Writing software, completing user stories, and prioritizing a backlog based on user feedback loops is precisely the things GTD is not for.
When I find these in my inbox, where do I put them?
- Ask Joe how he did X
- Ask about team style guidelines for Y
- Talk about the most reusable design for Z
- Organize UAT kickoff meeting
- Create stories for next sprint
- Convert Widget App MVP meeting notes to backlog tasks
- Meet to prioritize Widget App MVP backlog tasks
- Organize meeting on documentation keyword standards
- Respond to Meg's documentation review request
- Get Blah archive moved to new server
- Organize training for NewGuy on Gadget app
etc., etc., etc.?
Sure, I could enter all those as stories. And then I would be using Jira to do GTD. Which is fine. But that doesn't mean that Jira replaces GTD. It means that GTD uses Jira.
I would say that in terms of GTD lists, they would (among other things) be an Agenda context.Those kinds of events are setup just one time as recurring meetings forever (or thereabouts). There's nothing special about them.
Interesting. Is assignment of tasks or decisions about actions, during scrum, forbidden by strict agile rules?here's nothing to track for delegation or such
Do the ad hoc meetings just happen? Nobody ever has to arrange to meet, or prepare for those meetings, do research either before or after the meetings? Similarly, there's never any prep before sprint planning meetings or digestion afterward?Ad-hoc meetings are usually either for clarification on details or for creating work to go into the backlog/sprint (circumstances depending) to be prioritized in the next sprint planning meeting. Ceremonies follow the later anyways.
Or are you saying that all of things things are treated as stories? Say, "Meet with Joe and Kim" goes into Jira as a story, and "Get Fred's requirements before meeting with Joe and Kim" also goes into Jira as a story? If it's the second, then I would again say that you're doing GTD in Jira.