Hello all-
After listening to the recent Mindmapping webinar, I have been exploring the possibilities of applying mindmapping techniques to visually represent the arguments contained within a discussion, lecture, or text.
My idea was to capture graphically a summary of the arguments, their explanations, premises and conclusions, to quickly see how "everything fits together".
The reason for doing it is when I merely jots notes down, the information too often lacks structure, and I sometimes wish I could look at a "picture" or a "map" of the entire discussion, lecture, or text, for later review, recollection, or analysis.
So I experimented mindmapping a discussion using as guinea pig the podcast Kelly Forrister and Wayne Pepper did on someday/maybe lists (cf. Coaches' chat series).
As it turns out, using mindmapping to visually represent a series of arguments does work, as long as one is ready to spend the extra time required to capture all the useful information.
You'll find the mindmap in attachment to this post.
A personal take-away from this exercise:
I didn't realize how much information I let fall through the cracks when listening to a webinar, until I forced myself to restate the arguments, elicit the logical links between them, and tried to make sense of every bit of information the coaches share.
I am not sure if this experiment of mine would be of interest to others, but I am sharing it in case it might.
Cheers,
Eric
Attached files image_478.pdf (70.1 KB)
After listening to the recent Mindmapping webinar, I have been exploring the possibilities of applying mindmapping techniques to visually represent the arguments contained within a discussion, lecture, or text.
My idea was to capture graphically a summary of the arguments, their explanations, premises and conclusions, to quickly see how "everything fits together".
The reason for doing it is when I merely jots notes down, the information too often lacks structure, and I sometimes wish I could look at a "picture" or a "map" of the entire discussion, lecture, or text, for later review, recollection, or analysis.
So I experimented mindmapping a discussion using as guinea pig the podcast Kelly Forrister and Wayne Pepper did on someday/maybe lists (cf. Coaches' chat series).
As it turns out, using mindmapping to visually represent a series of arguments does work, as long as one is ready to spend the extra time required to capture all the useful information.
You'll find the mindmap in attachment to this post.
A personal take-away from this exercise:
I didn't realize how much information I let fall through the cracks when listening to a webinar, until I forced myself to restate the arguments, elicit the logical links between them, and tried to make sense of every bit of information the coaches share.
I am not sure if this experiment of mine would be of interest to others, but I am sharing it in case it might.
Cheers,
Eric
Attached files image_478.pdf (70.1 KB)