kelstarrising
Kelly | GTD expert
This response from David is worth a read if you ever feel overwhelmed by long lists:
https://gtdconnect.com/upclose.php?id=255#entry
https://gtdconnect.com/upclose.php?id=255#entry
Yes, this is so good! One can become shocked when they see ALL of their commitments listed in projects and actions.This response from David is worth a read if you ever feel overwhelmed by long lists:
https://gtdconnect.com/upclose.php?id=255#entry
It is part of the Connect library, so you can’t access it without an Connect account. But you can sign up for the free two-week trial period to read itIs this content free of charge to read?
To add to Tristans comment, if you're serious about GTD i would highly recommend the connect membership. It will help take your practice to the next level.Is this content free of charge to read?
One more comment. If your lists are ridiculously long, then you have too many commitments. Now you need to create a backlog and renogiate your commitments to a manegeable level.
Agreed! I just looked at my context and projects lists and they're plenty long!I would not generalize this. It highly depends on the number of lists you use. Imagine someone using just one master list with let’s say 140 items (slightly above average). I wouldn’t per se consider this person overcommited.
But what we can agree on is that if your lists get too long you should have a close look at your system and renegotiate the way you are looking at your lists. Maybe this will lead to defining some items as backlog or it will lead to a different implementation of your lists.
Cheers,
Tristan
Agreed! I just looked at my context and projects lists and they're plenty long!![]()
Same here. Especially @Computer is much too long. For me it will be reasonable to split it into @Windows and @Linux since on my dual boot system both contexts are quite distinguished
Maybe that’s a task for a sunday evening – like now …
Cheers,
Tristan
The best next action in the Windows sublist would be to fully convert to Linux ;-)
But I know (writing this from a Win machine) that's not possible...![]()