Longstreet
Professor of microbiology and infectious diseases
Thanks, John. But I always interpreted that as a meeting with your team members to discuss the project - not an appointment with yourself.
Hello. In Making It All Work, when explaining the factors that comes into play when deciding on the next action to do, David Allen suggest the idea of time blocking :Show me the plethora of teachings from GTD on making appointments for yourself.
[...] based upon all the other prioritizing factors, you may need to create specific structures and block out sufficient time slots for the important actions that require them.
Another good example is the weekly review for which David Allen recommends to block out time for it.Realizing, as you look through your calendar while considering what’s changed in the last few days, that you had now better block out two hours for yourself in the coming week so that you can finish drafting a document on time, is the kind of “aha!” moment that can help prevent the loss of control.
I would recommend scheduling a two-hour block of time. You’ll make good use of it, I’m certain, even if you don’t need the entire amount for the Weekly Review.
This is the crux of it for me. Whenever I stop blocking time on my calendar/making appointments with myself to focus on the important-but-not-urgent, I fall into 'latest & loudest' processing, my projects stagnate, and my sense of overwhelm rises. A weekly review & accompanying pause for creative thinking & planning brings me back to focus on these projects, but to actually get the work done I need the calendar reminder in the moment. It's a reminder that my 'forward-planning self' has left for my 'in the moment self' about my big picture projects & goals....have found those bigger important but not urgent projects with larger next actions are just languishing on my lists. Personally I find if I don't plan ahead, it's very hard to get into a state of Deep Work.
I can only encourage you to interpret to your advantage, rather than in any way that leads you to think you are not practicing GTD effectively. And effectively is going to be different for all of us. Speaking from experience, effectively also changes over time, as my areas of focus change.Thanks, John. But I always interpreted that as a meeting with your team members to discuss the project - not an appointment with yourself.
I can say amen to that. There is a part of me, sort of a hamster on a wheel, that still believes that if work fast on latest and loudest I can catch up. But as David Allen says, "There is no catching up, there is only catching on." So I need to have the part of me that catches on do some planning.This is the crux of it for me. Whenever I stop blocking time on my calendar/making appointments with myself to focus on the important-but-not-urgent, I fall into 'latest & loudest' processing, my projects stagnate, and my sense of overwhelm rises. A weekly review & accompanying pause for creative thinking & planning brings me back to focus on these projects, but to actually get the work done I need the calendar reminder in the moment. It's a reminder that my 'forward-planning self' has left for my 'in the moment self' about my big picture projects & goals.
I seem to recall some additional homage to this in the book, though I'll admit I didn't pick up on it until a 2nd or 3rd read-through.This example isn't a plethora, but perhaps a start. It's from the Getting Things Done book, on how to use the calendar for time-specific actions.
"Time-Specific Actions: This is a fancy name for appointments. Often the next action to be taken on a project is attending a meeting that has been set up to discuss it. Simply tracking that on the calendar is sufficient."
That includes mention of a timed calendar appointment as the next action to move a project forward.
Bravo, Jared! I agree - thanks for sharing!I seem to recall some additional homage to this in the book, though I'll admit I didn't pick up on it until a 2nd or 3rd read-through.
It seems to me that time-blocking or scheduled tasks are a more advanced GTD move. For beginners, I think there may be more pitfalls of trying to use the calendar as a to-do list and "refrigerator magnet syndrome," particularly for people who are already overloaded.
Once you've got the fundamentals down and have a better understanding of what belongs on your calendar, I think this approach can be an elegant and sophisticated application of the GTD principles.
But I'm a time blocker... so what do I know
Yes, I do too. I think DA used to time block writing the book (!) after a while, if I remember correctly. Somewhere he shares that, don't know where though.I seem to recall some additional homage to this in the book,
Well, it's nicely stashed away in the "What's new in GTDConnect" forum. I know that unless I someday sign up and pay, I'm not going to be able to follow links in that forum.How do I view the article without buying the membership, "Power use of the calendar"? Posting the link in this forum is not much of a help if only a select few can actually view it.
How do I view the article without buying the membership, "Power use of the calendar"? Posting the link in this forum is not much of a help if only a select few can actually view it.
I'm just seeing this thread now as it was originally posted before I became a GTD Connect member. So I know I'm reviving a years-old debate. But I have a question -- and not a rhetorical one. Why in the world would I want to convince you to stop doing something that works for you. Why is this a debate? I'm genuinely confused.Please everyone convince me why I should not time block as I have described.
Uhm, wow. OK. It was your challenge to everyone, not mine. As far as it not being a "debate," I've seen people argue about this idea, pro and con, on and off for quite a while. I dunno, to me it all looks very much like a debate. YMMV.it is not a debate and everyone can of course do what works for them. Period. End of "debate".
I am not in the least "upset". I was simply in this thread trying to understand why the entire concept of time blocking is not "taught" in the context of GTD whereas coaches clearly tell you that it is fine. All that is "taught" is deciding moment to moment what to do. As a professor and scientist, this seemed illogical to me that time blocking would not be a part of deciding on what you would do in the week ahead. That is all. But there is a wide range of thought on this here and on other forums. And that is why I said there is no "debate". One does what works best for them.Uhm, wow. OK. It was your challenge to everyone, not mine. As far as it not being a "debate," I've seen people argue about this idea, pro and con, on and off for quite a while. I dunno, to me it all looks very much like a debate. YMMV.
I guess I was asking because over time I've seen multiple posts from you where you've articulated a challenge relative to your work, explained in a pretty reasonable way how time-blocking addresses it, and it seems to work really, really well for you. Moreover you've made a pretty good case for why people in similar circumstances might benefit from it.
On the other hand, there are people who have explained why they don't do it, and in their circumstances that seems to make sense too.
And it seems to me that both approaches are pretty consistent with GTD. Yet I see some people arguing (not necessarily you, but others) that *everyone* should be doing it, and some arguing that *no one* should be doing it.
So when you asked people to convince you otherwise (and granted, I realize this was back in 2021, but it's not like this hasn't popped up before or since), I was wondering why. Because, like I said, what you're doing sounds like a really good solution to an issue you've faced.
But apparently somehow I've offended you. I apologize. I guess I'll steer clear of you regarding this topic. I regret expressing support for someone doing what works for them. If telling you that you that you've done a good job explaining why this works for you and is consistent with GTD principles, I regret that too. I better not tell you I think it makes a positive contribution to the forum (I do think that, but I guess I shouldn't say it). That might really upset you.
Fair enough. I guess when you asked people to "convince you otherwise," it brought to mind some brouhahas. But you're right, this wasn't one of them.As a professor and scientist, this seemed illogical to me that time blocking would not be a part of deciding on what you would do in the week ahead.