I have had some success with GTD in the past, but I have run into some stumbling blocks. I have what I think would be fair to call a very active and creative mind, so when I start writing everything down, my lists quickly balloon with hundreds and hundreds (if not thousands) of items. The investment of time simply to capture and process everything is considerable, because new things occur to me pretty much all day. I also find that with the increased awareness that GTD brings me of my various tasks, I end up taking care of more of the little things that normally I would forget to do, so this also constitutes an increase in time investment. So, for me the upshot has tended to be (when using GTD as opposed to not using it):
--- Much more time spent on capturing and processing
--- Much more time spent on not-very-important but "urgent" items that otherwise I would have forgotten
--- Slightly less time spent on big, amorphous, but important projects (at least I think so -- I have not done precise tracking)
--- The vast majority of the items I capture end up forgotton in a snooze bin, because I simply can't find the time to review everything.
So, I end up wondering: is it really important for someone like me to capture everything? Or are there practical limits, whereby in order to get anything done we have let some stuff go uncaptured/unprocessed and focus on the important stuff?
I would be interested in any insights others might have on these dynamics.
(There are some other relevant threads, such as the following, but I figured that my specific set of questions/observations warranted a separate thread.)
http://gettingthingsdone.com/forum/f...jects-sm-s-etc
Edit: I just found another relevant thread. It is in the context of ADHD, which I do not have, but it does ask some of the same questions:
http://gettingthingsdone.com/forum/f...eone-with-adhd
--- Much more time spent on capturing and processing
--- Much more time spent on not-very-important but "urgent" items that otherwise I would have forgotten
--- Slightly less time spent on big, amorphous, but important projects (at least I think so -- I have not done precise tracking)
--- The vast majority of the items I capture end up forgotton in a snooze bin, because I simply can't find the time to review everything.
So, I end up wondering: is it really important for someone like me to capture everything? Or are there practical limits, whereby in order to get anything done we have let some stuff go uncaptured/unprocessed and focus on the important stuff?
I would be interested in any insights others might have on these dynamics.
(There are some other relevant threads, such as the following, but I figured that my specific set of questions/observations warranted a separate thread.)
http://gettingthingsdone.com/forum/f...jects-sm-s-etc
Edit: I just found another relevant thread. It is in the context of ADHD, which I do not have, but it does ask some of the same questions:
http://gettingthingsdone.com/forum/f...eone-with-adhd