smithdoug said:
Katherine, it's been about six weeks since you launched this great adventure and a month since the last post. I'm curious. How is it working out? Any new observations or conclusions?
I just got back from a week-long overseas trip. That brought me face-to-face with a significant limitation of an all-paper system: portability. It's easy to jam everything you could possibly need into an electronic device (PC or PDA), much more difficult to do that with paper. (Especially when you're going to be gone for a week and fascist security critters are strictly enforcing the one carry-on rule. Grumble grumble grumble...)
Contacts were easy, since I still keep those electronically. Make sure I've synced Outlook to my iPod recently, and I'm all set.
NA lists were relatively easy, since the trip agenda severely limited my ability (or desire) to work on other things. I actually brought my master project notebook along, but could have gotten by with just the NA lists for the two or three projects that I planned to work on. I cleared my @email and @phone lists for the week, so I only had to deal with mail and calls that came in while I was gone.
The calendar was the most difficult. Even though I originally planned to keep using Outlook's calendar, in practice it's turned out to be easier to have just one primary calendar. But, since that's paper and bulky, I didn't want to bring it with me. For this trip, I was willing to work without a net: the conference supplied a written agenda, and I didn't have any appointments outside of it. Even so, not having my post-conference calendar handy was occasionally frustrating. For trips with more complex and independent itineraries, I'll definitely need to work out a better solution. That probably means going back to Outlook more, but I'm still figuring it out.
For day-to-day work in my office, and for day trips away from my office, I'd say my paper system is a complete success. I trust the system more, yet I spend less time maintaining it. For longer trips, the limitations of paper are clearly evident. I don't travel enough for those limits to be a major problem, but I do need to put some thought into working around them.
I have noticed some project creep on my NA lists, in that I'm reluctant to set up a full blown project for items that only have three or four steps. That was true with an electronic system, too, so it's not a paper-specific problem. I suspect the solution is something like the Cascading Next Actions method (
http://www.marktaw.com/blog/CascadingNextActions.html), which I'll be trying during my next Weekly Review.
Katherine