Hi all,
There is some disagreement over on this Wikipedia discussion page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Getting_Things_Done#Software_related_to_GTD
It discusses the main Wikipedia GTD page pointing to this page - a list of GTD software but heavily populated with adverts for their non-gtd coaching and methodology:
http://www.priacta.com/Articles/Comparison_of_GTD_Software.php
...Which links to this page explaining why their methodology is better than GTD.
http://www.priacta.com/Training/Training_FAQ.shtml#TROGTD
So if you have an opinion (either way) about this, I'd encourage you to weigh in. I have a potential bias as I develop GTD software but I feel the issue is greater than that. Surely a page that is linked to from the Wikipedia, about GTD, should point to someone (anyone!) who isn't promoting their own alternative methodology?
There is some disagreement over on this Wikipedia discussion page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Getting_Things_Done#Software_related_to_GTD
It discusses the main Wikipedia GTD page pointing to this page - a list of GTD software but heavily populated with adverts for their non-gtd coaching and methodology:
http://www.priacta.com/Articles/Comparison_of_GTD_Software.php
...Which links to this page explaining why their methodology is better than GTD.
http://www.priacta.com/Training/Training_FAQ.shtml#TROGTD
So if you have an opinion (either way) about this, I'd encourage you to weigh in. I have a potential bias as I develop GTD software but I feel the issue is greater than that. Surely a page that is linked to from the Wikipedia, about GTD, should point to someone (anyone!) who isn't promoting their own alternative methodology?