gtdstudente
Registered
@Mrs-Polifax and @fooddude
Thank you both very much for your good GTD of mutual concern
If "What is It?" is the first dynamic question from Inbox to Organize, is to be appropriately answered, then chances are good that GTDer would like the benefits of good 'know control' without needing to think since the thinking was GTD presumably already done
Alas, when one engages with their GTD system then it would seems that the first question thereafter needs to be a so very, very, very static question:
"Where is It?" in reaping the benefits of appropriately answering the first "What is It?" question and preventing all seemingly becoming unraveled in what now what seem like a most undesirable multi-flustering dynamic question despite best efforts?
Potential remedy for at least some improvement: Slower-&-Smaller for more Next Action/Sequential* awareness ?
Been there . . . still there . . . hopefully no more there
As you see GTD fit. . . .
The post has one thinking, GTD is one of the best possibilities one can do to 'stop' [postpone] one's 'world' before the world barks back: "nice try kiddo" ?
Lack of 'Sequential awareness' as a potential root of the problem:
*Next Action/Sequential awareness: As was humbly understood Mr. Allen express in the following paraphrased manner:
A Next Action is truly only a Next Action when the absence of any Next Action to the Next Action is possible
Thus, when a random Next Action shows-up for the Next Action item other than its originally intended Next Action, then attempts to find the Next Action item for some other random intervening Next Action could become daunting to find ?
Thank you both very much for your good GTD of mutual concern
If "What is It?" is the first dynamic question from Inbox to Organize, is to be appropriately answered, then chances are good that GTDer would like the benefits of good 'know control' without needing to think since the thinking was GTD presumably already done
Alas, when one engages with their GTD system then it would seems that the first question thereafter needs to be a so very, very, very static question:
"Where is It?" in reaping the benefits of appropriately answering the first "What is It?" question and preventing all seemingly becoming unraveled in what now what seem like a most undesirable multi-flustering dynamic question despite best efforts?
Potential remedy for at least some improvement: Slower-&-Smaller for more Next Action/Sequential* awareness ?
Been there . . . still there . . . hopefully no more there
As you see GTD fit. . . .
The post has one thinking, GTD is one of the best possibilities one can do to 'stop' [postpone] one's 'world' before the world barks back: "nice try kiddo" ?
Lack of 'Sequential awareness' as a potential root of the problem:
*Next Action/Sequential awareness: As was humbly understood Mr. Allen express in the following paraphrased manner:
A Next Action is truly only a Next Action when the absence of any Next Action to the Next Action is possible
Thus, when a random Next Action shows-up for the Next Action item other than its originally intended Next Action, then attempts to find the Next Action item for some other random intervening Next Action could become daunting to find ?
Last edited: