Connecting Notes and Task Lists

[fooddude]

Overreliance on Context? By focusing on just the very next action within its context (although true to GTD), there's a risk of losing sight of the bigger picture, particularly with multi-step or long-term projects. You said "if I miss a next action it comes up in my weekly review and I can note it then" but that could have impact if you're not regularly reviewing the overall goals or steps, then something might slip through the cracks.

GTD is context based. I only rely on context. For example, I can't do @Home stuff if I'm not at home.

Weekly Review Pressure? The system places significant reliance on a thorough weekly review to catch missed actions or maintain alignment with project goals. If the review is skipped or rushed, gaps in progress could emerge.

The weekly review is integral and one of the most neglected pieces of GTD.

Difficulty with Complex Projects? For projects that require significant foresight or coordination of multiple tasks, not having a pre-planned sequence of actions could cause delays. For instance, if dependencies between tasks aren’t clear, it might result in inefficiencies.

Never an issue. I can only do the very next action.

Limited Cross-Context Tasks? If a project involves tasks in multiple contexts (e.g., calls, errands, and emails), it might be harder to see how they connect or ensure progress without explicitly linking them together.

Again you can only do the next action. I really don't have cross context next actions. Except for the ones I noted. I ensure progress by doing the very next action. The things you mention are the exact things I tried to eliminate from my system. I wanted to rely on contexts and weekly review. Use a simple project list, a someday/maybe list, 5 contexts and I currently have 3 agendas. Sometimes I have up to 5 agendas but I eliminate them when I don't need them any longer.

 

[bobusa]

Looks like this works very well for you, thanks for clarifying. I agree, the simpler the system the less one has to work the system to get results. It's great to see other techniques here, it helps for my goal to revise my system as well.

 

[samuelethan]

Thanks for sharing and I agree that it does cater for creativity. However, I see some challenges.

Overreliance on Context? By focusing on just the very next action within its context (although true to GTD), there's a risk of losing sight of the bigger picture, particularly with multi-step or long-term projects. You said "if I miss a next action it comes up in my weekly review and I can note it then" but that could have impact if you're not regularly reviewing the overall goals or steps, then something might slip through the cracks.

Difficulty with Complex Projects? For projects that require significant foresight or coordination of multiple tasks, not having a pre-planned sequence of actions could cause delays. For instance, if dependencies between tasks aren’t clear, it might result in inefficiencies.

Increased Cognitive Load? Keeping track of what the "very next action" should be, without a more structured plan, can demand more mental energy. While this system is simpler in some ways, it also relies on your ability to consistently capture the next action and remember the larger context.

Limited Cross-Context Tasks? If a project involves tasks in multiple contexts (e.g., calls, errands, and emails), it might be harder to see how they connect or ensure progress without explicitly linking them together.

Weekly Review Pressure? The system places significant reliance on a thorough weekly review to catch missed actions or maintain alignment with project goals. If the review is skipped or rushed, gaps in progress could emerge espaço invisível 2025.

That said, the challenges you face can depend on your specific work style and circumstances. It seems like you've found a rhythm that aligns well with your needs, if this works for you then that's perfect.

thank you so much for your suggestion