Ready For Anything, Chapter 48
kewms;62092 said:
An item that you've decided not to address for a given period of time would be on hold for that period, would it not?
Katherine
Totally unrelated to this discussion, I was reviewing the GTD literature this morning. Chapter 48 of
Ready For Anything shocked me, though I've read it twice before and had no untoward reaction.
The focus of this chapter is a "long-term project . . . like 'restructure the department,' 'create a strategic task force,' and 'develop a personal-investment strategy.'"
David tells us that there is an important distinction between long-term projects and someday/maybes. And the difference has
nothing to do with time horizons. The difference is that we are committing ourselves to seeing a project realized and we are not committing ourselves to someday/maybes. The way we demonstrate our commitment is by creating a Next Action for a project.
So far, so good. Nothing radical there, to those of us who have been practicing GTD for a while. Now comes the mind-blowing part. If we are committed, then we are committed to closing the open loop that is the project
as soon as possible. What does that mean? "'As soon as possible' may be seven years, but it is still 'as soon as possible.'"
In plain English, a project is not on hold, according to David Allen, even if we are not going to do the Next Action seven years from now. Once we've put that Next Action in our system, there is an open loop that we are committing ourselves to close. A project with a Next Action is active. It is not a someday/maybe. Its time horizon is
as soon as possible. A someday/maybe item in our system does not create an open loop. We are not committed to it. It has no time horizon. Once we've committed ourselves, it's not a someday/maybe.