• Our deepest thanks to the many GTD enthusiasts who have posted in and read this forum over the years. Because use has been steadily declining in recent years, we have reluctantly decided to make this forum a read-only reference archive. There is an active GTD discussion community on the new GTD Connect. Copy/paste this link to get a free trial: https://bit.ly/4hYicYV We still offer a range of other free resources for GTD enthusiasts at: https://gettingthingsdone.com/resources/

Project: Achieve Mind Like Water/Black Belt Status

A semi-serious question:

If this is one of my projects (i.e., a state which does not exist at present but that I want to become reality in the future), how will I know when I'm done?
 
This is a cliche', but it works:

Make it:

Specific
Measurable
Action-Oriented
Realistic
Time-Dimensioned
 
What's your successful outcome ? If you envision "wild success" what will you look like , feel like , how will you act as a GTD black belt ?

I'd jot down some thoughts along those lines and then when you've got a clear picture ask yourself --what's the very next action I need to do to start moving in that direction --it might be a series of actions because this is more of a process than a project. All the same --the people I know who "got" GTD had an idea of what they wanted to acheive ,the others who "tried it " told me various reasons why they can't/won't do it.
 
Hi,

For something like this I might use a 10 point scale to rate performance. So today you might rate yourself a 5 out of 10, your goal is to consider yourself a 10 out of 10. Once you reach 10 you can consider the "project" complete and successful.

My 2 cents.
 
I soooo want to be here

I did not realize how longggggg it owuld take for me to implement this. What a backlog!

Anyhow -- I have a question about projects -- Can I have a project on my action list that is active but not being worked on by me right now. In other words, is the project list only active projects that I have a NA on in the next 7 days otherwise it goes on Someday/Maybe. I'm sure this sounds wierd, but I am not sure how to divide the Projects with the Someday mabyes. Also, do I have on project list aor do I have a work project list and home project list, scout project list, etc.

Thanks again!!!
 
apologies for the bad typing

I apologize to everyone for the bad typing. Will do better from now on!
 
Susie, no apologies needed -- most people on this board are pretty busy and I personally don't run a spell check before I post :wink:

re: your question -- you can keep projects that you're not working on this week on your list. I think DA said the project list was for a 90 day range etc. If you're not going to touch it in the next 3 months, it probably belongs on your someday list. --
 
Great response above.

I recently created a system for all my paper filing. The result I wanted was to able to find and replace any paper file withing 30 seconds.

The Goal was to create the ideal filing system.

Having a defined result means I can actually test my system and see if it measures up.

Kee up the good work everyone.

Guy
 
Just a thought...

I'm very well educated in traditional, structured Project Management techniques. All that being said, I'm not sure that GTD isn't on to something:

- come up with a vision - it might be completely unrealistic
- if you do enough things, eventually you'll get to a good enough place.

It's a kind of naturalistic approach to Project Management. I'm not sure it isn't worth more thought. Many a project has exceuted perfectly using structured PM techniques and been a complete failure (and vice versa).
 
Susie -

Re: a single project list, or one for work, one for home, etc.

I have two lists, Projects @ Home and Projects @ Work. All of volunteer activities go under the @ Home list, because they can be done at work. Initially everything was in a single list, but I found that I needed to be able to do short reviews of my work projects, without my view being hindered by home projects.
 
furashgf said:
Just a thought...

I'm very well educated in traditional, structured Project Management techniques. All that being said, I'm not sure that GTD isn't on to something:

- come up with a vision - it might be completely unrealistic
- if you do enough things, eventually you'll get to a good enough place.

It's a kind of naturalistic approach to Project Management. I'm not sure it isn't worth more thought. Many a project has exceuted perfectly using structured PM techniques and been a complete failure (and vice versa).

Actually David refers to his method as "the natural planning model"
see his book for more details -- it works very well with any size project.

Paul
 
Top