Short version of thread about creating an ultimate password system to use for everything or all passwords originating from daniel F

[Oogiem]

"store critical data in a place you do not control." like lots of data?
but persons who probably do are probably more economically developed right says voice

or maybe I should stop following this thread now
cos ...
- im not the type of person who going be data breached says voice

You are not understanding what I said.

Any place that has lots of potentially important and critical data, like passwords, is going to be a target for hackers. The issue is the storage of things that matter to you and can affect your wellbeing that is the issue not how much you have or do not have. I'd argue that it's even MORE important for people of modest means to be concerned about data breaches of their data becasuse they stored it in places that are major targets simply because they have less to lose.

If you are Bezos or Musk or Gates you don't care because if you lose a few hundred, or thousand or more dollars due to data loss you can afford to pay folks to chase down and clean up the mess. Folks with less spend an inordinate amount of time trying to get back to a stable state and any loss is magnified. The less you have the more important it is for you to control your own data and guard your resources carefully.

 

[TimBourne]

You are not understanding what I said.

OK

Any place that has lots of potentially important and critical data, like passwords, is going to be a target for hackers.

Right?

The issue is the storage of things that matter to you and can affect your wellbeing that is the issue not how much you have or do not have.

OK

I'd argue that it's even MORE important for people of modest means to be concerned about data breaches of their data becasuse they stored it in places that are major targets simply because they have less to lose.

oh right your writing 'people of modest means' stored data in places that are major targets' ? I had to read over

If you are Bezos or Musk or

I don't know those two

Gates you don't care because if you lose a few hundred, or thousand or more dollars due to data loss you can afford to pay folks to chase down and clean up the mess.

your saying those people are rich

Folks with less spend an inordinate

amount of time trying to get back to a stable state and any loss is magnified. The less you have the more important it is for you to control your own data and guard your resources carefully.

"unusually or disproportionately large; excessive:"

oh right your writing people who have less stuff or money - should actually be more concerned?

well

P.S.

gates - is person who has used paper binder system, which @Gtds (I mean @FocusGuy was sharing about)

 

[Oogiem]

people who have less stuff or money - should actually be more concerned?

YES

 

[TimBourne]

YES

'I'm in that situation being v@ccine injured myself, low wage

Can you help put an end to reason (behind myself creating this thread?

I'm not sure its worth my energy right now cos got so many important thing on my mind SV in 2minutes *

S